Home | Business | Energy and Mining | A Nuclear North Africa

A Nuclear North Africa

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

Oil and gas remain critical sources of power and energy for North African nations. In the medium term, hydrocarbons will remain the predominant sources of energy, whether it is for the OPEC countries of Algeria and Libya or the less-oil-endowed nations of Tunisia and Morocco. But in the longer term, the nuclear option appears interesting to all as oil reserves are depleted and securing new sources of energy is a strategic priority.

On the ground, all North African nations have been working somewhat to develop nuclear capabilities for civilian and industrial use. Each country has put in place programs that have been supported or endorsed by a Western super power, notably France, which has obvious economic interest in helping develop such industry.

The North Africa Journal Take:

* Despite media noise in the region that relay political views instead of depicting the reality, no single North African nation is contemplating the use of the nuclear option for non-civilian purposes. Various media sources and analysts outside of the region have also been raising red flags but we believe their positions are unfounded and without any base, essentially motivated by political reasons. Neither Morocco, nor Algeria, and certainly neither Libya nor Tunisia have the interest in a nuclear base for military purposes. The current regional security risks are about classic terrorism activity to counter Al Qaeda and its proxies and require a classic approach to defense and enforcement. Intra-Maghreb feuds and political disagreements, including between Morocco and Algeria over the Western Sahara region do no rise to the level of conflicts that may justify a nuclear arsenal.

North AfricaJournal on facebook* North African governments are looking for the post-oil era. And while nuclear is an important option, they are also looking for alternative sources of energy from wind to solar. At the end, all countries will likely adopt a balanced portfolio of energy sources, which would include nuclear as well.

* Nuclear is often referred to as the targeted source of energy that would power tomorrow’s sea water desalination plants in the region. We expect to see the first efficient and large scale nuclear power plants to take shape in about 10 years from now, however, with a remote possibility of truly national entities, that is plants designed, built and operated by North Africa firms to the chagrin of the nationalists and the pro-independence views in the region. Not only the technology is complex, but developed nations are helping their companies control critical aspects of the supply chain in the nuclear sector. That is not likely to change.

* Western companies will continue to dominate the sector, aided by their governments, with a monopoly over the supply of enriched uranium and over the recycling of nuclear waste in the downstream.

* Finally, the level of success of a nuclear North Africa will greatly depend on how successfully the so-called Desertec project is promoted and executed. This project highlights the competitive nature of a nuclear France and a solar Germany, both looking to get the attention of the Southern Mediterranean and Middle Eastern countries with their own technologies.

Book a North Africa Specialist* For Western countries, we recommend a pro-active role that would not deny the region access to nuclear capabilities for civilian purposed, while insuring that any transfer of technology is precisely about civilian use. A proactive role means that the region is engaged toward a path of a controlled and transparent buildup, void of secrecy and with the nature of guaranteeing economic growth for the local populations. Such economic growth, through the availability of energy is a necessary move to avoid social and economic disruptions, and then lead to fostering insecurity and terrorism.

* For North African nations, we recommend a multi source approach to energy supply. The region cannot afford dependence on nuclear. It is politically unacceptable. Beside, the vast Sahara desert can also be source of enormous renewable energy. The German approach to solar energy is no doubt worth pursuing. We also recommend that any nuclear program put in place should come with complete transparency so as to avoid a disastrous outcome a-la-Iran.

* Continue here to read the analysis (subscribers access here .. Or to subscribe, click here)

Comments (2 posted):

Ahmed on 08 July, 2010 04:23:59
where is egypt? as much as i know, egypt is part of north african countries, why do not u mention egypt in any of your articles. if u mean the maghreb countries why did u name it north africa then.
Reda on 01 July, 2014 06:46:23
to Ahmed North Africa has always been the Maghreb ( The Maghreb is a term given by the Arabs it represents the geografic location ( the west )) Egypt is a middle eastern country North AFricans are predominatly Arab speaking berbers or Amazigh but just half in Morocco where half of the berbers speak berber.plus Africa has always been the name of the region west of Egypt now that name is describing the entire continant North Africa seems to be the right name for the region because the north africans have nothing in common other than the religion and the standard arabic as the official language.

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Rate this article
Connect with Us
Connect with Us
Click below if you like