Home | Politics | Security and Politics | Security Council OKs No-Fly Zone over Libya, World Rallies against Gaddafi

Security Council OKs No-Fly Zone over Libya, World Rallies against Gaddafi

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image

[The North Africa Journal] The Security Council authorized on March 17, 2011 the use of force in Libya to protect civilians from attack, specifically in the eastern city of Benghazi, which Colonel Muammar Gaddafi has reportedly said he will storm tonight to end a revolt against his regime.

Acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which provides for the use of force if needed, the Council adopted a resolution by 10 votes to zero, with five abstentions, including those of veto-wielding China and Russia, authorizing Member States “to take all necessary measures… to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamhariya, including Benghazi, while excluding an occupation force.”

The Security Council’s decision paves the way for an international action to block Gaddafi’s entry into Benghazi. British and French warplanes are said to be able to make initial air raids on Libyan positions as early as Friday, the BBC reports, citing senior U.N. sources. Arab allies might provide logistical support. Already NATO, French and British navy assets are nearing Libya while the Wall Street Journal reports that “Egypt is shipping weapons and ammunition to Libyan rebels. The shipments, mostly assault rifles and ammunition, are apparently the first known instances of an outside government arming the rebels, who have been losing ground to Muammar Gaddafi's forces.”

Comments (2 posted):

Carol Wickenkamp on 17 March, 2011 10:03:40
avatar
In regards to your intelligence briefing regarding the U.S. committment to military involvement in Libya via the UN. I and my family have concerns about involvement in Libya. We believe that Germany's response in the UN Security Council vote on the "no-fly zone" was appropriate, that there is danger in taking part in that kind of operation.

"No-fly zone" is just an euphemism for war. It is an act of war to begin shooting down planes, bombing facilities, and "taking out" installations. We have no business engaging in war with another country with no provocation or threat to our national interests. To engage in this action will, I believe, bring grave threats to the United States and result in the loss of American lives and property, as well as continued loss of life in North Africa. We believe that the "leadership" that is being displayed by the European nations is a form of condescension, the the nations of North Africa are quite capable of leading themselves without our intervention. I did not see any North African or Gulf region jump to send in troops or aircraft to quell the violence. I trust their judgement over Hillary Clinton's.
FreeMan on 24 March, 2011 11:26:41
avatar
This decision is WRONG . . .It is a declaration of war against a sovereign state, imposed by the US, UK, France. In order to gain access to FREE OIL. That's all.
Libya is not a member of NATO, NATO has no right to interfere in a non member sovereign state.
There are other UN mechanisms such embargo . . .and s.o.

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Rate this article
0
Connect with Us
Connect with Us
Click below if you like